RadzenMask bug when pattern contains mask characters

Hello @Team.

If you have characters in the pattern that are also present in the mask, some unexpected results happen:
Mask: "(**) *****-****"
Pattern: "[^0123456789() -]"

Besides this bug, I also think that if one is at a certain point of the mask when it inputs a char that is equal to the one in the mask, then a new char shouldn't be inserted. In the above example for instance, if the first character inserted was '(', then the resulting text should be only '(', not '(('.

Hi @kim,

At the moment this is indeed not supported.